During my exam process, I decided to develop my understanding by visiting three different museums, the Tate Modern, The National Gallery and Somerset House. Throughout each museum I saw completely contrasting works, varying from beautiful, technical sculptures, to historical portraits. I feel that the Tate Modern influenced me the most, it contained a huge amount of expressive pieces and surrealism. I found both photography and expressive pieces side by side and this really inspired me. In addition to that, I found a new photographer, Henry Wessel, which really changed the way I looked at photographs with colour and without. I feel that looking at the photographs without colour really changes they way you think about them, I feel that it brings a darkness to the photos, which I strangely liked. The National Portrait Gallery offered me the chance to looked at "traditional", historical and royal work. This led me to looking at the work of Monet, an artist whose paintings of landscapes really interested me. The way he slightly blurred his paintings so you had to look closely at what interested you really caught my attention. The final gallery I visited was Somerset House where I was able to look at the work of Guy Bourdin, a fashion photographer whose work gave me inspiration to start to look at taking photos of people and covering up different parts of their body and how this affect what people thought of them and the photos. I feel that seeing art work in real life is completely different to what you expect to see. I expected to be standing opposite a wall, behind a barrier of glass box, looking at a piece of work that I couldn't really get close too. Galleries are nothing like this, you obviously can't touch the work but you are able look as closely as you want too. You can look at the work for as long as you want too, you may not always get this experience due to technology letting you down. I feel that galleries change the way you look at work, you may have two completely contrasting pieces of work next to each other and you are introduced to a style of artwork you may have never considered before. For example, sculptures have never been something that have really interested me, however when visiting the Tate Modern, I found myself indulging in in a variety of sculptures. Before visiting a gallery, I would have never really considered sculptures and I think that it why it is so important to view art work first hand.
The main artist that fundamentally changed and inspired my work was Gerhard Richter. I think his work will continue to inspire me every time I look at it. I believe that the variety of work he can produce leaves me in such amazement and that was what I was first really interested in by his work. I found Gerhard Richter's work in the library when searching for a book on a artist that really interested me. The first paintings of his I saw was"9.1.89", of a person or small child with paint expertly yet freely placed on top of the photograph, which covers up the face of the subject. This really interested me because I felt it fit so well within the topic of indistinct because I felt that not being able to see the subjects face completely changed the way I look at the photo. Richter's use of colour influenced me extremely throughout my exam process. The way he uses a similar colour then adds another completely contrasting colour which flicks throughout the streaks of paint creating an beautifully interesting tonal value. I couldn't say that my other artist Bruce Conner was discarded along the journey but I believe that he influenced me differently to Richter's work. I find Conners work a lot harder to study because the back story to most of his work is so in depth. Neither the less, I adore his work. I was introduced to Conners work by my teacher, and I knew that I would want to study his work. I find his use of found objects to create his work extremely interesting, they add so much more to the piece, like individual stories being added just bring more to each piece. Overall, I am extremely pleased with both of my artists, although I did only have two, I feel that they have inspired me enough and supported me enough to carry me through my exam process.
My theme for this process was "indistinct", a theme that originally interested me at the start of the process but I didn't choose until about two weeks into the process of my exam. I feel that the theme of "indistinct" really hit home. As I developed my work throughout the process, I develop looking at how society judges people without be able to see there face. I feel that this concept really interested me because as a teenager within society I feel judged a lot by things such a fashion, looks, body image and intelligence. Therefore I felt that I had a larger basis of ideas to work from. The main problem I faced during this journey was convincing people to let me take the photos, however once I had stated to them that you wouldn't be able to see their face their responded changed completely. People often asked to see the picture after and mainly complained about how they looked but felt reasonably comfortable because there face would be covered. I found this really interesting and it became an really important aspect for me to present within my work.
I feel that I have really incorporated the use of material within this exam process therefore I believe that this is the newest way of working. Bruce Conner gave me the most inspiration for venturing out into using different materials than I previously had. For example, I decided to use different pieces of leather which I then decided to sew together to create an almost thick sheet of paper. I then looked at hanging it within my book on two separate pages. I felt that using different materials and techniques such as sewing has changed my perception of my work. I felt that it mades my work stand out more, the people became more real on the pages. This was really important to me.
I feel that all of the above has led to the creation of my final piece. I feel the my artists that I have chosen have really helped me to discover and conjure up ideas that really feel personal too me. I definitely feel that my final piece means something to me and I feel that it mean something to other people too. Everyone one has some sort of insecurity therefore I feel that my final piece really explores the way you judge people and how not being able to see there facial features really makes them become indistinct. My final piece To improve my final piece, I would have defiantly liked to have create some more pictures. As I think about it now, I feel I would explore different ways of presenting my final piece if I had to chance to do my exam piece again. Whilst I really love the book because of the beautiful black and white toned pages, I feel that leading up to the exam I could have given myself some varied ways of presenting my final piece therefore I wouldn't feel as trapped to one particular piece which I believe did hold me down partly. To conclude, I am really happy with how my final piece turned out, although I did have trouble with the colour tones throughout my final piece, I feel that it really represents what I want it too.
Below are some pictures of my final piece-
No comments:
Post a Comment